And finally, I’ll be discussing the intersection between them and my thoughts on the decision to structure the mode in this way. I’ll do the same for the second act, highlighting in particular the differences between the two that led me to enjoy that version of the game a lot more.
In this review, I’ll share my thoughts on the first act of the game: the mechanisms, the exploration, and the distribution of rewards. I think for me, the best approach to sharing my opinions on World of Light is to treat it as two distinct experiences, with the caveat that you have to finish one in order to obtain the other. It feels unfair to review the entire mode as negative because of the first half, but it also feels unfair to review the entire mode as positive because of the second. So different was my perception of this second act that it actually changed my outlook on adventure mode. I had no idea that there was more to World of Light than it seemed on the surface, but the shift in tone and gameplay style that happens around halfway into the adventure makes the game feel significantly different. I found myself agreeing with a lot of the criticism I’d heard at first, but then something happened: I hit the adventure’s second act.
I had my concerns given how much criticism I’ve read or heard for World of Light, but I decided to try out the game anyway. As the slowest way to unlock characters, there isn’t much of an incentive for players to gravitate to this mode unless they truly want a mechanically crunchy single player experience. I heard it was too long, too much of a grind, with not enough variety and features to make the game feel worthwhile. I heard a lot of horror stories about Smash Ultimate’s adventure mode before I played it for myself.
0 kommentar(er)
